You are here: Home / Pathfinder / Identifying adaptation measures / Public / Collective / Institutional analysis

Is it possible to generalise beyond single cases?


Within governance emergence approaches, a distinction is made between approaches assuming it is possible to generalise beyond a single case, and those that do not. Latter is assumed usually by anthropological and ethnographic approaches. In contrast, approaches from new institutional economics which have made significant and extensive contributions to the natural resource and water management literature assume that insights can be generalised beyond single case studies on a higher level of abstraction.



AP interactive decision tree - click any node to select it

Within governance emergence approaches, a distinction is made between approaches that assume it is possible to generalise beyond a single case, and those that do not. In the latter case, anthropological and ethnographic approaches that assume that this is theoretically not feasible. In contrast, approaches from new institutional economics which have made significant and extensive contributions to the natural resource and water management literature (e.g., Ostrom, 2005; Hagedorn et al. 2002; Bougherara et al. 2009) assume that insights can be generalised beyond single case studies on a higher level of abstraction. While the abovementioned assumption of complexity making prediction difficult limits the generalisable conclusions from any particular study about which institutions lead to which outcomes, the accumulation of evidence has led to conclusions about general characteristics of socialecological systems that can be related to desirable outcomes. A description of these methods, with examples, is provided in the  Toolbox section on institutional analysis.



This section is based on the UNEP PROVIA guidance document


Criteria checklist

1. You want to identify adaptation measures.
2. Your focus is on public actors and on collective actions.
3. The interdepencence is two-way.
4. There is no coordination solution.
5. It is not sufficient to describe actors and institutions.
6. Outcomes of institutional arrangements can not be predicted.
7. Governance emergence explanation has been addressed.
8. As a next step you are faced with the question whether it is assumed that that one can generalise beyond single cases.