You are here: Home / Pathfinder / Identifying adaptation measures / Public / Collective / Institutional analysis

Governance description


Institutional description (or governance description) is composed of methods that describe the actors and institutions relevant for adaptation. Due to adaptation being a relatively new field, there are a number of approaches to describe the actors and institutions relevant for adaptation in a given geographical location or sector, e.g. for different levels of decision-making: national governments, local governments and private individuals. This type of approach requires no strong theoretical assumptions, and contributes to adaptation by providing a more comprehensive description of the policy context in which adaptation takes place.
After finishing this step, you should return to the Adaptation Pathfinder's entry point.
To main entry point selector



AP interactive decision tree - click any node to select it

Institutional description (or governace description) is composed of methods that describe the actors and institutions relevant for CCVIA. Due to adaptation being a relatively new field, there are a number of papers in the scientific literature that remain strictly descriptive of the actors and institutions relevant for adaptation in a given geographical location or sector. For example, Tol and Klein (2008) review the institutional context for adaptation in coastal zone management in Europe. They identify three levels of decision-making: national governments, local governments and private individuals. They find that national level decisions are partly determined by EU policies, e.g. in Coastal Bathing Water Directive, the Water Framework Directive and the Habitat Directive. This type of approach requires no strong theoretical assumptions on the part of the analyst, and contributes to adaptation by providing a more comprehensive description of the policy context in which adaptation takes place.

Question addressed

Identifying the relevant actors and institutions for adaptation.

Conditions of applicability

Climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability are a result of many actors interacting and making many interrelated decisions.

Theoretical assumptions

-

Steps taken

1. Identify actors and institutions

Results achieved

Description of institutions and actors relevant for adaptation.

Issues involved

[text to be added]


Example cases from literature

Tol and Klein (2008) review the institution context for adaptation in coastal zone management in Europe. They identify three levels of decisionmaking: national governments, local governments and private individuals. The EU regulates certain areas in Coastal Bathing Water Directive and nature, through the Habitat Directive. National governments are at different states of awareness regarding coastal management, different states of urgency.

MEDIATION Toolbox

Read more in the Toolbox under the following category:

Governance description

Toolbox detail page(s) available for:

Socio-Institutional Network Mapping


This section is based on the UNEP PROVIA guidance document


Criteria checklist

1. You want to identify adaptation options.
2. Your focus is on public actors and on collective actions.
3. There is no simple coordination solution.
4. It is sufficient to describe actors and institutions to advance adaptation.